Protocol Mechanics
Core mechanisms ensuring MegaETH's security, reliability, and economic sustainability.
USDm & Fee Model
MegaETH partnered with Ethena to launch USDm, a native stablecoin that fundamentally reimagines how L2s sustain themselves economically.
The Problem with Traditional L2 Economics:
Most L2s make money by adding a markup to transaction costs. They pay X to post data on Ethereum, but charge users 2X or 3X. The higher the fees, the more profit for the L2 - but the less people want to use it. This creates a conflict: the chain makes more money when users pay more, which directly discourages the usage needed for growth.
USDm Solution:
MegaETH redirects value from financial yield rather than users to fund network operations, enabling the chain to price gas at-cost.
How It Works:
Reserve-backed issuance - USDm v1 built on Ethena's USDtb rails, backed primarily by BlackRock's tokenized U.S. Treasury fund (BUIDL) via Securitize
Yield funds operations - Reserve yield programmatically covers sequencer operational costs
At-cost gas pricing - No margin extraction from users, keeping fees low and predictable
Incentives realigned - Network growth increases stablecoin circulation, not user fees
Reserve flexibility - Architecture allows future adjustment to include other Ethena products like USDe
Benefits:
Sub-cent, predictable transaction costs enable new categories of applications
Network sustainability without raising fees as activity grows
Complements token utility (sequencer rotation, proximity markets) for diversified revenue
Other Stablecoins:
USDT0 (canonical USDT) and cUSD remain first-class citizens with deep liquidity, oracle coverage, and best-execution routing across the ecosystem.
Announcement | Pricing Scenarios
Settlement & Fraud Proofs
MegaETH secures its optimistic rollup model with a revolutionary non-interactive ZK fraud proof system, built in partnership with RISC Zero and following the OP Kailua hybrid architecture.
Traditional Interactive Fraud Proofs (Bisection Game):
Classic optimistic systems require challengers and proposers to engage in back-and-forth disputes on Ethereum, bisecting transaction execution step-by-step until isolating a single faulty operation.
Problems:
High latency - hours or days per dispute
Heavy proposer involvement - even honest proposers must defend against baseless challenges
Griefing risk - malicious challengers force honest parties to waste gas repeatedly
MegaETH's ZK Fraud Proof Model:
Instead of interactive games, challengers submit a single succinct zero-knowledge proof demonstrating that executing the payload from the initial state does not produce the claimed final state.
How It Works:
Challenger runs disputed computation in RISC Zero zkVM
Generates proof showing the state proposal is invalid
Submits proof to Ethereum verifier contract in one transaction
Proposer does no work and cannot interfere
Proof generation costs ~$100 in worst case, borne by dishonest party
Key Innovation: ZK for Fraud, Not Validity
MegaETH uses ZK not to prove correctness upfront (like ZK rollups), but to prove fraud when detected. This retains the efficiency of optimistic rollups while adding trust-minimized, non-interactive dispute resolution.
Finality Timeline:
7-day challenge window - retained for maximum security
~1 hour dispute resolution - once challenge raised, ZK proof resolves it quickly vs. days in interactive systems
Near-instant finality post-ZK transition - reorg window reduced to narrow gap between execution and proof submission
Understanding the Two ZK Models:
Today (Optimistic + ZK Fraud Proofs):
State updates posted optimistically to Ethereum
If disputed, ZK proof demonstrates fraud and resolves in ~1 hour
7-day window means theoretical reorg risk exists throughout challenge period
Protection: sequencer economically aligned, all infrastructure handles reorgs automatically
Future (ZK Validity Proofs):
Every state update accompanied by ZK proof of correctness
Finalized on Ethereum immediately upon proof verification
Reorg risk reduced to narrow gap between execution and proof submission
L1 reorgs - if Ethereum itself reorganizes, MegaETH must follow and rebuild its state accordingly (this is by design - MegaETH's security is anchored to Ethereum, so it inherits both Ethereum's stability and any rare reorganizations) - Source
This two-phase approach delivers optimistic efficiency today while building toward ZK-level finality guarantees.
Data Availability via EigenDA:
Challengers need reliable access to raw block data to reconstruct disputed computations. MegaETH uses EigenDA for decentralized, high-throughput data availability.
Sequencer publishes block data to EigenDA
Only small reference committed to Ethereum
Cryptographic guarantees ensure data retrievability
Any watcher can reconstruct blocks and generate fraud proofs
Prevents sequencer from withholding data to evade detection
Benefits:
Removes griefing attacks
Protects chain liveness from malicious stall attempts
Scales to high throughput without compromise
Maintains security through cryptographic proofs
Sequencer Dynamics
MegaETH implements a hot backup system for zero-downtime operations, with future evolution toward multi-region sequencer rotation.
Current Implementation:
Primary sequencer broadcasts execution progress continuously
Hot backups track every block in real-time
On failure, backup takes over within tens of milliseconds
New sequencer resumes exactly where previous stopped
Key Innovation:
Instead of asking "where did you stop?" during a crisis, backups already know through continuous tracking. This flips traditional handoff models for instant recovery.
Performance Trade-offs:
Ethereum rotates validators every 12 seconds - maximizes decentralization
MegaETH rotates only on failure or scheduled maintenance - optimizes for consistent 10ms blocks
Brief pause during sequencer switch vs. continuous real-time execution
Benefits:
Automatic hardware failure recovery
Upgrades without downtime
Foundation for future sequencer rotation model (see Tokenomics)
Maintains real-time performance guarantees
Decentralization Path
MegaETH's approach to decentralization is nuanced and progressive, addressing multiple dimensions beyond simple validator counts.
Four Key Dimensions:
Liveness - Multi-sequencer failover today, regional rotation coming
Censorship Resistance - Exit to Ethereum always available, future sequencer rotation provides diverse operators
Credible Neutrality - Progressing toward Stage 2-like bridge contract where team has minimal control
Permissionless Participation - Sequencer rotation enables anyone to operate based on stake and reputation
Why MegaETH Can Credibly Decentralize:
Traditional L2s struggle to give up sequencer control because it's their primary revenue source. MegaETH has diversified revenue through:
USDm yield - Stablecoin reserves fund operations
Proximity markets - Colocation bidding generates value (see Tokenomics)
Transaction fees - Only when MegaETH is operating as a sequencer
This enables MegaETH to credibly decentralize sequencing without sacrificing sustainability.
Current State:
Multi-sequencer failover live
Settlement to Ethereum provides ultimate censorship resistance
Team-operated but economically aligned with ecosystem
Future State:
Rotational sequencer across geographic regions
Proof-of-Authority style inclusion with staked reputation
Stage 2-like security guarantees
Diverse operator set
Philosophy:
Decentralization isn't binary. It's a spectrum of technical properties implemented differently across chains. MegaETH prioritizes sustainable growth while progressively reducing trust assumptions.
Last updated